About  |  contact  |  Search  |  RSS
Last Update: 3 Hour and 10 Minute ago
News code: 28991
Published Date: Monday 3 February 2020 - 13:42:35
Print 

Dismal ‘peace deal’ would exacerbate violations, enshrine impunity: Amnesty

Dismal ‘peace deal’ would exacerbate violations, enshrine impunity: Amnesty
World  - The Trump administration’s dismal package of proposals to violate international law and further strip Palestinians of their rights is a handbook for more suffering and abuses in Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPT), Amnesty International said today.

The organization urged the international community to reject measures contravening international law that are set out in President Donald Trump's so-called "deal of the century". These include a formal extension of Israel's sovereignty over the Jordan Valley and the vast majority of the illegal settlements in the rest of the occupied West Bank in exchange for land currently inside Israel.

"While the Trump administration has emphasized the principle of land swaps in its deal, we should make no mistake that it is proposing further annexation of Palestinian territory, which would flagrantly violate international humanitarian law. During more than half a century of occupation Israel has imposed a system of institutionalized discrimination against Palestinians under its rule, denying them basic rights and access to effective remedies for violations. The deal amounts to endorsement of these brutal, unlawful policies," said Philip Luther, Amnesty International's Middle East and North Africa Research and Advocacy Director.

The proposed land swaps include the potential transfer of areas of Israel with a high proportion of Palestinian residents to a future State of Palestine. This in itself raises concerns that Palestinian citizens of Israel in these areas might be disenfranchised.

Amnesty International is calling on the international community to reject annexation proposals, which violate international law, and reiterate the illegality of Israeli settlements in occupied territory. Such proposals will not change the legal obligations of Israel, as the occupying power, under international humanitarian law and international human rights law, nor deprive Palestinians of protections guaranteed under these legal frameworks.
The deal also includes proposals to create a "compensation mechanism" for Palestinian refugees, instead of granting them their right to return. With currently more than 5.2 million registered refugees, Palestinians are one of the world's largest refugee populations. Palestinians who fled or were expelled from their homes in 1948, and their descendants, have a right to return under international law. This is an individual human right which cannot be given away as a political concession.

"Hundreds of thousands of Palestinian refugees are trapped in overcrowded camps, more than 70 years after they, their parents or grandparents were first forced out of their homes. This proposal ignores refugees' rights under international law and the decades of suffering they have endured," said Philip Luther.

Finally, the deal seeks to undermine international justice shortly after the announcement last month of progress towards an investigation by the International Criminal Court into the situation in the Occupied Palestinian Territories. It insists that, during any negotiations, the Palestinian authorities must take "no action, and dismiss all pending actions, against the State of Israel, the United States and any of their citizens before the International Criminal Court, the International Court of Justice, and all other tribunals."

In December 2019, the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court announced that a preliminary examination into Palestine had concluded that war crimes had been committed in the Occupied Palestinian Territories and that an investigation should be opened once the Court's territorial jurisdiction had been confirmed.

The deal also demands that the Palestinian authorities take "no action against any Israeli or United States citizen before Interpol or any non-Israeli or United States (as applicable) legal system". This is a blatant attempt to stop Palestinians seeking justice in national courts of third countries using universal jurisdiction, an essential tool of international justice.

President Trump launched his "peace deal" on January 28 in the form of a 180-page proposal entitled Peace to prosperity, saying that it would be a "realistic two-state solution" that had already been agreed to by Israel as the basis for negotiations with the Palestinians. The plan was prepared without any input from Palestinian leaders.

 

News Code: 28991
Published Date: Monday 3 February 2020 - 13:42:35
No Comment,Be the first one who comments.
Comments

Name

email  

website

Comment  

Security code [*]: Please enter correct answer in security box.:

 = 8-4

Opinion
If Black Americans were to seek asylum, they would easily qualify
If Black Americans were to seek asylum, they would easily qualify
Amali Tower, the Founder and Executive Director of Climate Refugees
Sanctions in the era of pandemic
Sanctions in the era of pandemic
Phyllis Bennis, a fellow of the Institute for Policy Studies in Washington DC
India's Muslims are punished for asking to be Indian
India's Muslims are punished for asking to be Indian
Vidya Subrahmaniam, award-winning Indian journalist and political commentator.
Bahrain is holding my family hostage – and the UK is abetting them
Bahrain is holding my family hostage – and the UK is abetting them
Sayed Ahmed AlWadaei, the advocacy director of BIRD
How Israel controls Palestinian bodies, both living and dead
How Israel controls Palestinian bodies, both living and dead
Mariam Barghouti, Palestinian writer and commentator
Why has it been such a deadly year for French women?
Why has it been such a deadly year for French women?
Megan Clement, a freelance journalist based in Paris.