About  |  contact  |  Search  |  RSS
Last Update: 1 Day and 18 Hour and 6 Minute ago
News code: 28355
Published Date: Tuesday 8 October 2019 - 09:31:26
Print 

UK rights group reveals secret government Prevent database

UK rights group reveals secret government Prevent database
World  - A British human rights group has revealed a covert government database being used to monitor and control communities.


A British human rights group has revealed a covert government database being used to monitor and control communities.

The database, which belongs to Prevent, part of the United Kingdom's counter-extremism strategy, was uncovered by rights group Liberty through Freedom of Information (FOI) requests.

It includes sensitive personal information of every referral ever received by Prevent, which according to a UK official website aims to safeguard and support those vulnerable to "radicalisation".

However, the vast majority of referrals have not resulted in any de-radicalisation action, meaning that potentially thousands of people have been entered into the database based on their alleged thoughts and beliefs.

Information is gathered by public servants such as teachers who are compelled by Prevent to monitor and report signs of what they believe could indicate "extremism".

Police can add people to the database, which Gracie Bradley, Liberty's policy and campaigns manager, said is counterintuitive to the public's safety.

"It's about keeping tabs on and controlling people - particularly minority communities and political activists," she said in a statement.

"It is utterly chilling that potentially thousands of people, including children, are on a secret government database because of what they're perceived to think or believe," she added.

FOIs disclosed that the people referred to are not told they are on the database or what kind of information is held against them thereby making it difficult - if not impossible - to challenge.

This withholding of information and lack of awareness from those who are added to the database "disproves the government's claim that Prevent is a safeguarding policy", Liberty said.

Established by the Counter-Terrorism and Security Act of 2015, Prevent has been decried by academics, civil society groups, and rights organisations as a government-monitoring discriminatory strategy that is disproportionately directed at the country's Muslim population.

According to statistics from 2017, a Muslim in the UK is 50 times more likely to be referred to Prevent than a non-Muslim.

Harun Khan, the secretary-general of Muslim Council of Britain, called the database "deeply worrying".

"This database - over and above being a hugely authoritarian tool - will mean that the vast majority of those referred, who are found to have no terrorism link, will still be perceived as potential risks by the state, and this will disproportionately affect Muslims," he said.

"Our questions on transparency, accountability and oversight around Prevent now become even more important," said Khan.

"Will the Home Office and police release information on the demographic breakdown of this database and how it is used? Furthermore, have they considered the impact this will have on Muslim communities who already feel over-policed and misunderstood?"

According to Liberty, there is no confirmed figure regarding the number of people in the database.

In 2017-2018 alone, there were 7,318 referrals to Prevent, with nine out of 10 referrals not passed to Channel, the next step in the government's anti-extremism programme.

The education sector and police are the main forces behind referring people, at 2,426 people and 2,364, respectively.

SOURCE: AL JAZEERA

 

News Code: 28355
Published Date: Tuesday 8 October 2019 - 09:31:26
No Comment,Be the first one who comments.
Comments

Name

email  

website

Comment  

Security code [*]: Please enter correct answer in security box.:

 = 5+4

Opinion
America is likely complicit in war crimes in Yemen. It's time to hold the US to account
America is likely complicit in war crimes in Yemen. It's time to hold the US to account
Mohamad Bazzi, journalism professor at New York University
Mass shootings: The most American way to kill and die
Mass shootings: The most American way to kill and die
David A Love, Philadelphia-based freelance journalist and commentator
The treatment of migrants likely ‘meets the definition of a mass atrocity’
The treatment of migrants likely ‘meets the definition of a mass atrocity’
Kate Cronin-Furman,assistant professor of HR at University College London
A HR ambassador won’t convince the world that Britain cares
A HR ambassador won’t convince the world that Britain cares
David Wearing, Specialist on UK foreign policy in ME
The return of Palestinian refugees is quite possible
The return of Palestinian refugees is quite possible
Ahmed Abu Artema, Palestinian journalist and peace activist.